beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three years and a fine of seven hundred thousand won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. 2013Gohap312;
A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Forgery of Currency) and fraud 1 due to the use of forged currency in collusion with C. In a room where it is impossible to find out the Eel care room located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, on August 25, 2011, the Defendant copied the front and rear sides of the issuance of the Bank of Korea in advance by using a local radar compound, which is identical to the front and rear sides of the A4 page. C forged 46 copies of daily 46 gramograms by inserting the knife with the knife and adding the knife in black language. Accordingly, the Defendant forged the Republic of Korea log used for the purpose of exercising it in collusion with C. 2) On August 25, 2011, the Defendant, while calculating the cost of forgery from the south-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City No. 1 to the Gao-gu, Incheon in front of the Gao-gu to the Gao-gu, Incheon.
A. (1) As indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, a forged 10,000 won paper was delivered as if it were duly formed and exercised as if it were duly formed. In addition, the Defendant conspired with C, from around that time to September 1, 201, the Defendant exercised a total of 18 times as indicated in the attached list of crimes, by granting a total of 26 copies of the paper paper that was forged from the place of view in Incheon City, as indicated in the attached list of crimes. 3) Fraud Defendant 1
A. As described in paragraph 2, from the time to the front floor of H in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City by boarding a taxi with C along with C, and then to the victim F, 7,080 won, when calculating the taxi expense of KRW 7,080,000, which was forged, led the victim to deceptiond the victim by suggesting that the franchising of a forged right
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 7,080 from taxi expense, and received KRW 3,000 from the taxi expense.
In collusion with C, the Defendant is from around that time to September 1, 201.