1. The Defendants are classified as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1, respectively, on the third floor of the buildings listed in the attached list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 4, 2013, the Plaintiff and Defendant B Co., Ltd. entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with each of the three floors of the buildings listed in the attached Table list, setting forth a lease deposit deposit of KRW 10,00,00,00, the rent of KRW 600,000, and the management fee of KRW 50,000, and the lease of KRW 50,000 among the three floors of the buildings listed in the attached Table list (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. Defendant B, under the instant lease agreement, occupied the instant real estate, and was in arrears from May 2015.

C. Accordingly, around October 13, 2015, the Plaintiff notified Defendant B Co., Ltd. that the instant lease contract would be terminated on the grounds of rent delay.

Meanwhile, Defendant C Co., Ltd. occupies the instant real estate with Defendant B Co., Ltd.

【Reasons for Recognition: Each entry in Evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings】

2. According to the above facts of determination, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the plaintiff's notice of termination on the ground of rent delay. Thus, the defendant Eul corporation is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to each plaintiff on the ground of the termination of the lease contract of this case without permission.

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.