1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

가. 원고가 2017. 6. 하순경 피고에게 ‘2016. 11. 1.경 진단받은 <외상성 디스크 파열, 요추 협착증, 요천추 염좌 등>이 업무상 재해에 해당한다’는 이유로 요양급여신청을 하자, 피고가 2017. 8. 11. 원고에게 -별지(☞ 갑 1)에 나오는 바와 같은- 처분사유를 명시하여 이 사건 처분을 한 사실에 관하여 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없는 이 사건에서, 원고는 청구원인으로 원고가 ‘신청 상병’으로 내세우는 <외상성 디스크 파열, 요추 협착증, 요천추 염좌 등>이 ‘업무상 재해’에 해당함에도 불구하고 이와 다르게 판단한 이 사건 처분이 위법하다고 주장한다.

B. Therefore, there is a proximate causal link between the Plaintiff and the applicant’s work performed at the time and the external disc fever, the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

On the basis of whether the so-called “work personality” can be seen, part of the records, etc. on Gap 2-10 and Eul 1, which seems to support this point, are difficult to readily believe in light of the results of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the Director General of the Medical Examination Institute of the Association B Association in this court. Unless there is any other evidence to acknowledge this, the disposition of this case, which was made based on such judgment, shall be deemed legitimate. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s argument that the Plaintiff was internal tax cannot be accepted.

2. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim of this case.