Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant operated a non-registered occin on the three-lane road located in Dong Young-si, 10:58, D in front of D, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, and a statement on the following inquiry;

1. Inquiry of mandatory insurance, application of the Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Loss of Motor Vehicles that choose to be punished (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is engaged in driving service of the unregistered one.

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the above Obaon around 10:58, and driven the three-lane road in front of the D, which is in Tong Young-si, through a three-lane speed of about 30km in speed from the open church room to the front of the D, which is in Tong Young-si.

At the same time, the passage of the vehicle was frequent, and the signal was installed at the front section, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to take the front section and the left and left well, and to prevent the traffic accident by driving the vehicle safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to stop the signal on the front side, the Defendant did not discover the Fstunaly car of the victim E (56) driving from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the left side of the intersection as it was due to the negligence in the course of business entering the intersection, and received the front wheel part of the damaged vehicle due to the front part of the Defendant Oralba.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s car to be equivalent to KRW 1,446,696, such as the exchange of the front offender due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Determination: