1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs each amount stated in the "total" column of the attached Form 1 attached hereto and from February 7, 2013.

Basic Facts

Approval and Public Notice of Project - Construction Works for Opening Access roads (hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case"): Project operator - Public Notice of the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor: The adjudication on expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee publicly notified by the Sungsung-gun on September 27, 2010 - The date of adjudication on expropriation: December 14, 2012: each land entered in the details of compensation in attached Form 2 and each obstacle entered in the details of compensation for obstacles in attached Tables 3 (hereinafter referred to as "land in this case, etc.") - The amount of compensation: The amount calculated by calculating the arithmetic mean of the amount appraised by two appraisal business operators shall be as shown in attached Tables 2 and 3.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: Part of the land owned by the plaintiffs 1/3 of 1/3 Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, Y 1,594m2, who jointly own the remaining lot number located in the number of the remaining land on February 6, 2013, QR 97m2/10 B/10 m2/102, Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, Kim Sung-gun, Seoul, 346m2.

As stated in paragraph (1), the land was incorporated into the instant project, and accordingly, the land, as listed below, remains without being incorporated into the instant project.

(hereinafter) In the event that a specific land as indicated below is referred to, it is indicated as “the remaining land of this case” by the sequence No. 1). [The grounds for recognition] of no dispute, the evidence No. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings other than the plaintiffs’ assertion as to the purport of the plaintiffs’ assertion as to the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiffs asserted in the preparatory document dated Jun. 11, 2013, in the preparatory document dated Nov. 11, 2013, that the selection of comparative standard land was unlawful, obstructed objects of compensation, omission of obstacles, request for purchase of remaining land, and compensation for depreciation of the remaining land, but only the difference between the court’s appraisal and the adjudication of expropriation in the application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim as of Nov. 12,

(b).

The plaintiffs mentioned in subsection (1) are claiming the purchase of remaining land and the depreciation of the remaining land, and the following:

(b).

The remaining plaintiffs' arguments except for the plaintiffs' claims are all withdrawn.

The plaintiffs.