Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months and by a fine of 5 million won, and by a fine of 700,000 won.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. From the end of September 2016 to January 3, 2017, Defendant A: (a) inserted the phrase “I” and “J” with the Defendant’s smartphone from the end of Songpa-gu to the end of the day of September 2016; and (b) sent B, K, etc., waiting for the men who reported and contacted the above writing in advance; and (c) had B, etc. enter the nearby telecom with the men, and received KRW 1.50,00 won as the price for sexual traffic, and had B, etc. do sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. On December 21, 2016, around 22:30 on December 21, 2016, Defendant B received KRW 1.50,00 as a price for sexual traffic from a non-specific male in the name-based male who was assisted by A in the name-oriented female room in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “non-exploited female”).

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the police to B or K;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes, such as each control site photograph, and the K mobile phone photograph;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: both Articles 19(2)1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of sexual traffic, and imprisonment and fine;

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and Selection of fines

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act (the Defendants)

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) Defendants made confessions and reflects the reasons for sentencing; (b) Defendant A’s continuous operation of business even after the first crackdowns on police officers; (c) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime in the past; and (d) Defendant B has been under the control of crimes similar to those in the previous several times.