logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.10.31 2014고단1323
공무집행방해등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:50 on August 15, 2014, at around 02:50 on August 15, 2014, the Defendant: (b) extracted a national flag that was cultivated before the new post office located in 58, the crew of the Daegu Seo-gu, and was parked by generating erogates; (c) was removed from the slope C (38 years of age) belonging to the Seongbuk Police Station B District, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report; and (d) took the police officer’s desire to “the police officer shall take the walk, i.e., the son of the police officer’s bridge, the son of the police officer’s hand, the son of the police officer’s hand, the son of the police officer’s hand, and the police officer’s son of the police officer’s hand, and the son of the police officer’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

2. On August 15, 2014, around 04:20, the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of the obstruction of performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and went to the B district unit located in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and at around 04:20 on August 15, 2014, the Defendant stated that “I will go to the toilet without sending it to the toilet.”

Accordingly, in order to raise the defendant's boom, the victim E (the 31-year old age), who belongs to the above patrol group, refers to "Ping four years of age" to the victim, "Iskn't bl't bl't bl'a of the same year," and the victim's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's fl's b

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

arrow