The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

from the defendant 91.

1. The lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) against the accused against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic by employing two or more women from around December 2, 2012 to around December 2, 2013 at an entertainment drinking house operated by the defendant and allowing the above women to engage in sexual traffic in the room in the entertainment drinking house. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm, such as putting women into commercialization and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and it is necessary to provide a good and severe punishment to the owner of the business who operates illegal sexual traffic businesses even in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual traffic businesses and to establish a sound sexual culture. The operation period of the commercial sex business establishments is not proper, the age period of the crime of this case is also a considerable amount of income gained from the crime of this case, and despite the fact that the defendant had been punished two times, it appears that there is no need for the defendant to engage in sexual traffic in the crime of this case, including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for the same kind of crime, and it appears that the defendant's sexual traffic business was operated by the criminal investigation agency or sexual traffic.