logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.10 2018고단708
상습특수절도
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with prison labor for special larceny at the common military court of the Republic of Korea on March 2, 2001; two years from the suspension of execution; three years from imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on October 26, 2004; two years from the same court on January 17, 2008; on November 10, 2015, with prison labor for the same crime; and on January 10, 2015, with prison labor for two years and six months from the support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju District on January 16, 2018.

Defendant

B On November 15, 1995, the Gwangju District Court rendered a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office, the disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases as a special larceny at the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office on July 11, 1996, the same court received a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases as the same crime in the same court on September 11, 1998, and on May 27, 2002, the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Office on May 27, 2002 and two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office on June 17, 2008, and completed the execution of the above punishment in the Jeju Public Prosecutor's Office on November 10, 2015 after being sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor as a special larceny.

[2] On February 9, 2018, around 11:30 on February 9, 2018, the Defendants confirmed that the victim was set up in front of the victim E’s residence, and that the victim was set up outside the victim’s house and set up separate bonds, and Defendant B reported the network, and Defendant A collected KRW 70,000 in cash from the victim’s wall located in TV line.

They have been in possession.

Accordingly, the defendants stolen the victim's goods by habitually combining them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. A vehicle lease contract;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, text of judgment, and current status of personal expropriation;

1. Habituality of judgment: The records of each crime, the number of crimes, and the frequency of crimes as indicated in the judgment;

arrow