logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.04.03 2014고단2424
사기등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2012, Defendant A’s fraud, around September 18, 2012, displayed two copies of FF Motor Vehicle Trading Co., Ltd. in E, on September 18, 2012, that the said Defendant was working for the two companies, while indicating the land cadastre in JJ’s location at the time of strike, and “the said civil lawsuit is suffering from the land located within this land.” The said civil lawsuit is in charge of a domestic job-friendly attorney, and is in favor of the terms and conditions. The said civil lawsuit is in favor of the five (1.50 million won) interest per month at the interest rate on the five (1.5 billion won) and the principal is short, if the principal is short, the payment will be made within one month and the two (1.5) month.”

However, the defendant A did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed 30 million won from the victim.

Defendant

A, on the same day, he/she acquired 28.5 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (K) account in the name of the defendant.

2. On September 20, 2012, Defendant A’s fraud, around September 20, 2012, concluded that “When Defendant A additionally lends KRW 20 million to the victim G, Defendant A is detached from the victim’s interest rate of KRW 8,000 per month (1.6 million), Defendant A paid the interest rate of KRW 1.6 million per month, and Defendant A paid the interest rate of KRW 5,000 per month to the victim’s interest. In addition, Defendant A made a false statement that Defendant A would be able to obtain money if he/she sells the waste even if he/she fails to pay money for a lawsuit.”

However, the defendant A did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed KRW 20 million from the victim.

Defendant

A, on the same day, he/she acquired 18,40,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (K) account in the name of the defendant A.

3. Defendant A’s obstruction of another’s exercise of one’s right borrowed KRW 20 million from G from around September 20, 2012, as described in paragraph (2), and Defendant A’s obstruction of another’s exercise of one’s right to the victim L.

arrow