Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) extracted support units installed by the victim in a vegetable vegetable field operated by the victim C near Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) extracted about five the vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetables

2. On May 29, 2018, from around 14:30 to 15:30 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s banking operations by force by preventing the victim from passing through his/her work vehicle by blocking the Defendant’s vehicle from entering the above site by blocking noise and soil dust at the construction site operated by Chungcheong budget-gun, and at the embling work site operated by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, especially ‘12-14 photographs (Evidence No. 42-43 pages) taken on May 29, 2018 and parked after being parked about about 10 minutes at the entrance of the scene, and they moved to the hospital, such as the above pictures at the time.

part to the effect that " (Evidence records 78-79 pages)"

1. A nearby cadastral map;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Investigation report (No. 12 of the evidence list);

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel on the investigation report (to hear statements by the complainant)

1. As to the criminal facts of paragraph (1) of the same Article, the defendant and his defense counsel shall extract several supporting groups in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget E (the land that the defendant had cultivated since several years) and immediately adjacent to it, and claim that "B (the support unit for the victim's garden) did not extract the "b" or "the head of the support unit for the victim's garden" did not deny the criminal facts of the damage to property.

However, according to the above evidence, it can be recognized that the defendant extracted the mother type owned by the victim from the support unit installed by the victim in the garden near B at the time ( regardless of whether the accurate lot number is B or adjacent E).