1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the rejection of the statement of evidence No. 17 or No. 19, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case was unlawful as evidence submitted at the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

▣ 제1심 판결문 제6쪽 열넷째 줄의 아래에 다음과 같은 내용을 추가한다.

「 2013. 6. 19.자 CT 영상에서 폐기종이 관찰되지만 폐기능 검사에서 정상소견을 나타내므로 경증으로 판단됨.」 ▣ 제1심 판결문 제8쪽 일곱째 줄의 “2012. 7. 6.”을 “2013. 7. 6.”로 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 제9쪽 넷째 줄의 아래에 다음과 같은 내용을 추가한다.

In the case of being admitted to the Korea Telecommunication Medical Center, the said high-person’s hospitalization was accompanied by the reduction of the heat and blood plate, and the reduction of the pulmonon level was observed, and the chief doctor of the Korea Telecommunication Medical Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center. However, in light of the fact that there was no pulmonary function accompanied by pneumoconiosis, and that there was no pulmonary function caused by pneumoconiosis, and that there was no pulmonary function examination conducted by the Korea Telecommunication Center at the Korea Telecommunication Center at the above Korea Telecommunication Center, it is insufficient to recognize that the above pulmonary disorder caused by pneumoconiosis was caused by the above pulmonary disease, and it is difficult to deem that the high-person was unable to receive pulmonary cancer treatment due to the pulmonary disease.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so ordered as per Disposition.