1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 2001, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant automobile was registered under the name of the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff was given a loan of KRW 10 million from a lending business operator under his name and demanded a certificate of personal seal impression, a certificate of personal seal impression, a certificate of resident registration, etc.

After that, the plaintiff returned to the so-called large-sized lane without the main entry of this vehicle, and the defendant acquired ownership by acquiring it and using it as an automobile insurance, etc., the defendant is obligated to take over the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership of the automobile from the plaintiff.

2. According to the result of the party examination and the purport of the entire pleadings against the Defendant, it is recognized that the Defendant was permitted to lend KRW 3 million to Nonparty C around 2003 and to use the instant vehicle. The Defendant subscribed to the automobile insurance several times and returned money from Defendant C until 2004.

However, only this point is insufficient to recognize that the defendant acquired the ownership of the instant vehicle by acquiring it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.