The judgment below

The guilty part of the victim D, the part of the victim E, such as a camera, and the part of the victim.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the judgment of the defendant and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") (1) 1 of the judgment of misunderstanding of facts : (a) only is the fact that the mother of the victim D was sexual intercourse with H; and (b) there was no sexual intercourse with the victim; and (c) confessions at the prosecutor’s office

② The statements made by the victim are not reliable, and the defendant's family register is indicated in the family register as "J", "I", "K, "S", "fairness, etc., in addition to indicating the date when the victim and E/H sexual intercourses with the victim or indicating in any other meaning than gender relationships, the statement in the family register alone cannot be deemed as having sexual intercourse with the victim on the date of this part of the facts charged.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged guilty is erroneous in violation of the rules of evidence.

(B) It was true that the defendant taken the body of the victim E on February 23, 2009 with the cell phone with the cell phone on February 23, 2009. However, the bareboat photographs of June 7, 2009 were not taken anew, but copied the above photograph of February 23, 2009, but it was erroneous that the court below found the defendant guilty until June 7, 2009.

(2) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (limited to imprisonment for seven years, confiscation, disclosure and notification of information for seven years, attachment orders for seven years, and compliance orders) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the prosecutor’s (1) misunderstanding of facts (A) the statement made by the victim D with respect to the non-guilty part of D is reliable, and in light of the content of the family registry and the process of preparing a list of crimes at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation by the prosecution, the defendant’s arbitrary confession made in the primary investigation by the prosecutor, etc., the court below indicated that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim on the date of this charge indicated as “I” or “S,” in addition to the part indicated as “I” in the family registry prepared by the defendant.