logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2016.01.12 2015고정203
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2015, at the meeting of the resident's meeting held in the apartment management office in Ansan-si, Dongdong-si, the Defendant did not spread the first medication or landscape trees to the apartment construction team in accordance with the mind of the victim D, who is the management of the above apartment, and dealt with it with with with the chairman of the resident's meeting of the resident's meeting in the selection and payment of the facility construction business operator. However, the Defendant's complaint and opinion with the residents of the above apartment construction "the minutes of the extraordinary general meeting" in the title of "the residents' complaint and opinion with the residents of the current U.S. administrator D weather are as follows:

It did not want to hear the opinions of the residents, sees their opinions, raises frequent drinking with the majority of the residents, forms a minority female and a group of women and a group of women in the complex, and disturbs the unity of the residents.

It is pointed out that there is no fluoral fluor, such as fluoring an article, even to the fluoral fluor, if you face.

The first system has been used at will in the apartment chemical zone, and the existing landscape trees have been cut arbitrarily, thereby harming the landscape in the complex without permission.

The selection, payment, etc. of a business operator for the installation of a large facility is not arbitrarily exercised and the disclosure report is not made, so there are many suspicions, and these days are more accumulated, so it is not good.

The purpose of this article is to prepare an incentive with the content of “an apartment resident” and to divide it into apartment residents who are gathered, and to read the content written on the incentive directly.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to E, F, and G;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A complaint, accusation, or printed matter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1)1 of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”).

arrow