(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.03.17 2017고단24

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.03.17 2017고단24

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 24"

1. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant, against the victim C, posted a false statement to the effect that he/she would sell middle- and long-term street North Korea on the Korean car page of the Republic of Korea, and reported it to the effect that he/she would send out the street to the victim C who contacted with the victim C.

However, the defendant did not have the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right.

Nevertheless, the defendant received 310,000 won from the damaged person to the corporate bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the defendant on the same day and acquired it by fraud.

2. On October 5, 2016, the Defendant, against the victim E, posted a false statement to the effect that he/she would sell heavy and digital exposure, and that he/she would send digital exposure to the victim E who contacted the statement.

However, the defendant did not have digital mino, and even if he received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to transfer mino.

Nevertheless, on October 6, 2016, the Defendant received 400,000 won from the injured party to the corporate bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by money.

"2017 Highest 115"

3. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim G, posted a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant sold a Alpha can monitor” on the Korean car page among the NAVERs, and reported it to the effect that “the Defendant will send a monitor if sending the price.”

However, the defendant did not have a monitor, and even if he received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to transfer the monitor.

Nevertheless, the defendant is under the name of the defendant on the same day from the injured party.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.04.26 2017고단2701

-전주지방법원 2016.06.08 2015고단1500

-인천지방법원 2017.04.14 2017고단872

-대구지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단5381

-전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2014고단2352