logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.24 2011가합139025
손해배상(기)
Text

1.(a)

Defendant A, B, C, D, and E are each of the plaintiffs in the “personal amount” list of the attached Form 1.

Reasons

1) The following facts are nonexistent between the parties, Gap evidence 2 (Evidence 2), Eul evidence 3 (Evidence 3 (Evidence 1)-1-3 (Evidence 5-2 (Evidence 1-2), Gap evidence 5-1 (Annual Report 2008), Gap evidence 5-2 (Annual Report 1-2009), Gap evidence 5-4 (yearly Report 3-209), Gap evidence 5-5 (Annual Report 2009), Gap evidence 5-5 (Annual Report 209), Gap evidence 5-5 (Annual Report 2009), Gap evidence 5-7 (Annual Report 201-2010), Gap evidence 5-1-2 (No. 201-200), Gap evidence 5-1-2 (No. 1-2010), Gap evidence 5-2 (No.5-1-2010), Gap evidence 5 (Annual Report 2010), Gap's audit report

1) The parties’ relationship 1) Defendant A Co., Ltd. (H Co., Ltd. prior to the mutual change on April 25, 2012, and I Co., Ltd. prior to the mutual change on March 28, 2008, and hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(2) The remaining Defendants, other than the Defendant Company and the Defendant G Accounting Corporation, hold office as the director, auditor, etc. of the Defendant Company, and their positions and tenure of office are as follows:

Defendant.

arrow