logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.18 2014고단4208
무고등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 20, 2014, around 11:50, the injured Defendant: (a) repaired the computer at the computer repair shop operated by the victim E (35 years of age) before the restaurant located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) and (c) caused verbal victims’ body, arms, parts of the buckbucks, etc., which were reported while making a mutual dispute with each other by not providing approximately KRW 400,000 for the cost of repairing the computer; and (d) caused the victim to be sprinked for approximately one week, both parts of the buckbucks, etc.

2. On July 14, 2014, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to E at the Gyeongginam Police Station located in 532, Chungcheongnam-si, Namyang-si.

The accusation statement states, “I am at around 11:0 on June 2014, at the time of the 11:00 a.m., I am at Ma-Ma-dong, Ma-Ma-Ma-dong, sent a warning that I would see the body of the suspect, and that I am sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually reported even though I continued to meet the body of the defendant.”

Nevertheless, the defendant submitted the above written complaint to an employee who could not know his name in tin.

In this respect, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant denies each of the crimes of this case. However, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant's statement, diagnosis, and oral assaulting the victim, which are the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, was sufficient in full view of the victim's consistent statement, diagnosis, and the defendant's statement that assaulting the victim. On the other hand, even in the case of accusation, the victim demanded the payment of the cost of computer repairs from the street which is a consistent statement of the victim and the open place, and the defendant and the defendant who attempted to refuse it and escape from the scene.

arrow