logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.15 2018고단5435
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 9. 6. 02:25경 B 그랜져 승용차를 운전한 후 서울 양천구 C 앞 도로에서, 횡설수설하며 보행상태가 약간 비틀거리고 얼굴이 빨갛게 상기되어 있으며 음주감지가 되는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 서울양천경찰서 D지구대 경위 E로부터 1시간 15분간 3차에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 정당한 사유 없이 이에 응하지 아니하였다.

As a result, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a alcohol test without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of statutes governing enforcement manuals;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act include two times the records of punishment for drunk driving in 2008, the details of the crackdownd by drunk driving and the reason for refusing to measure drinking, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., as indicated in the disposition.

arrow