1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The circumstances leading up to the disposition ① On May 19, 2015, the Plaintiff was enlisted as active duty servicemen at the 5th Order of the Korean Army, and was assigned to the 196th Order of the Korean Army on June 26, 2015, and was assigned to B waterway exclusively for the 196th Order of the Korean Army. On August 20, 2015, the Plaintiff participated in the guard operation.

② On November 10, 2015, on the other hand, the Plaintiff was under the diagnosis of 'Wooman' and SLAP bottle' (hereinafter referred to as the "the instant wounds') from the close close close close door, 'Wooman' and 'LAP bottle' (hereinafter referred to as ‘the instant wounds'). The Plaintiff was under the supervision of 'Wooman' and SLAP bottle'.

③ On February 5, 2016, the Plaintiff was transferred to supplemental service on the ground of “person with a difficult military service” and discharged from active service.

④ On July 13, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for distinguished service to the State, alleging that “The right shoulder was cut down and the fluor and the fluorial fluor was cut down,” while reheating spath as one type of spath in the 196 Spathar Dopole registry, the principal was in the atmosphere of rewarding,” with the instruction of the 196 Spathar Dopole registry, to the Defendant.

⑤ On October 25, 2017, following the deliberation and resolution of the Merit Reward Judgment Committee, the Defendant was deliberated and decided upon by the Plaintiff on October 25, 2017 on the following grounds: “The requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and the non-specific determination of the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation; and “the instant disposition” against the Plaintiff.

A. [The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the fact inquiry results against the head of the fifth assistant soldier’s office in this Court, the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had received medical treatment on October 2014 due to the right shoulder, which was before the military entrance. However, the Plaintiff was under the military life without any problem after being given medical treatment, after being given a favorable symptoms to the military. However, the Plaintiff was under the military life on August 20, 2015.