1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

1. Presumed factual basis

A. 1) Date/registration date/registration number of the instant registered trademark 1) / : 3) Designated goods classified as category 3: The date of initial, marina, fluencing, social misleads for human body, fluencing and flucing, skincing, skincing and flucing, mecing, mecking, mecking, cosmetics, cosmetics, cosmeticck, cosmetics, flucing, flucing, dis, skins, skins, satis, satis, satch-making, satch-making, sat-making, sat-making, sat-bek-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-be

(b) Goods subject to verification 1: 2) Goods used: cosmetic materials used in mixtures of glycerine, glycerine, and Acrylic acid’s public unity, PVM/MA public unity, propyol glycol;

C. On August 19, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant who is the trademark holder of the instant registered trademark with the Intellectual Property Tribunal for a trial to confirm the scope of the right of the instant registered trademark, asserting that “The challenged mark and the marks of the instant registered trademark all include “Csjel,” and their appearance and name are similar. However, the goods using the challenged mark are cosmetics belonging to category 1, and the designated goods of the instant registered trademark are different in quality, shape, use and usage, distribution route, and consumer due to the category of goods classified as category 3. The designated goods of the instant registered trademark are different in quality, shape, use, distribution route, and consumer, and it cannot be deemed as similar because they are related to raw materials and completed goods, and thus, the challenged mark does not fall under the scope of the right of the instant registered trademark.”