The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the judgment of the court below convicts the defendant, although the defendant did not get off the bus bus stop because he was not the victim, and there was an error of misconception of facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. On July 16, 2012, the summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below revealed that the defendant met D urban bus driven by the victim C at the bus stops near the dispatching ICT located in the Gu Government-si, and that "the above bus stops" were "the victim who passed the old bus stops located in the Gu Frac City E," but "the bus stops cannot be cut off due to no side length, and will be stopped at the next stop." After that, the defendant tried the victim at the bus stops in the H market bus stops located in G, which are located in the next stop, and the victim Da expressed his desire to the above bus at the time of the bus stops, and the victim Da was guilty of the defendant's injury to the victim's chest at one time, and the victim's chest at one time, and the victim's chest at one time, the court below found the defendant guilty of part of the CCTV statement in this case under the CCTV Act.

B. (1) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the result of the verification of CCTV images conducted in the trial, the following facts are as follows: ① the Defendant was on board D urban bus operated by the victim C at the bus stops near the Trian ICT on July 16, 2012; ② the Defendant was on board the bus at around 23:57 the same day, ② the Defendant was unable to use the low level level around the passage of the bus stops at around the time when the bus stops located in the old Friter, and ③ the victim was on board the bus at a place other than the bus stops.