1. 3/108 shares in each real estate listed in the separate sheet are 3/108 shares in the Plaintiff A, 2/108 shares in each of the Plaintiff B, C, D, and 1/24.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The land survey division concerning the H of Goyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Goyang-gun, Goyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “Seoul-do, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do,”) prepared during the Japanese occupation occupation period, is indicated as N was under the circumstances of N in 1913 (two years in 1913). The land described in paragraph (1) in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”), which is not registered, is divided into the land described in paragraph (2), 590 square meters before K, hereinafter “H” or “I Dong-dong”). The land described in paragraphs (3) and (4) is divided into the 602 square meters before K, 122 square meters before K, L, 122 square meters before L, 150 square meters before M, and 150 square meters before each of the changed administrative districts.

B. O, P, Q, N (hereinafter collectively referred to as “O et al.”) filed an appeal against the above land situation. On August 10, 1916, the Korea Land Investigation Commission rendered a ruling on August 10, 1916 that the mother land of this case was jointly owned by O and three other.

The ruling is written with the N's address in light of the light R.

C. On the other hand, S, the primary domicile of the Plaintiffs in the primary domicile of the removed injury, is the Gyeongnam T (T; hereinafter “the deceased”) located in S’s family register, was born on February 12, 193, and his lineal descendant succeeded to the deceased’s property solely by his lineal descendant, after he died on February 12, 193.

V, after the death of February 23, 1993, succeeded to property according to the inheritance shares of 1/3 of W, X, and Y, each of whom is a child.

W, after the death of May 3, 2010, the plaintiff E and F inherited the property according to their respective inheritance shares of 1/2.

X died before the mother V, and the plaintiff G, a lineal descendant, inherited his property on behalf of the deceased.

Y On July 30, 2017, the Plaintiff A, her husband, succeeded to the property according to the inheritance shares of 2/9, respectively.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-11 evidence (including branch numbers in case of additional number), purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The above-mentioned evidence and the facts acknowledged are all the arguments.