A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2016, around 07:55, the Defendant was under control on the ground that he operated FOba in the bus-only lane from police officers E belonging to the Seoul Heavy Police Station, who controlled traffic on the front of the D cafeteria located in Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In order to request the suspension and driver's license to the above E, the Defendant is aware of the fact that "I did not violate".

The term "the above Oral Ba" and the above Oral Ba continued to proceed, and E has prevented the front of the Oral Ba and continuously demanded the driver's license, and he again taken the Oral Ba in the process of speaking "Hah, as he does not have any fact of violating the laws and regulations." In the process, the above Oral Ba, which is an object dangerous to the left part of the E's left part, was completely taken.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with legitimate performance of duties by police officers on traffic control, and the victim E (the victim E) suffered injury to the left-hand salt field and strawing in need of approximately 2 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. On-site recording files CDs;

1. The parts and degree of injury as indicated in the judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, diagnosis reports, and investigation reports (verification of treatment details, etc. related to injury) related to the upper parts of the elbbows

1. Article 144 (2) (main sentence), Article 144 (1), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The fact that the defendant violated the order of suspension of the victim, and that he proceeded with the victim by disregarding the victim's stobane between the defendant and the defendant's stobane, but there is no sufficient fact that the victim was stobane.

(b)A household, the defendant's office is Oral.