Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person running a management company for improvement projects of E District Redevelopment Project Association in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Inc., a management company for improvement projects in the E District Redevelopment Project Association in Seodaemun-gu, and is working as H in the Internet Portal Portal Portal Rof B’s “G” car page, and Defendant B was a member of the said association, who was working as the chairperson of the J Liquidation Measures Committee.

The Defendants conspired with each other, around May 2013, up to the middle of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for the Liquidation Countermeasures Committee on the ground that there is suspicions about the liquidation fund execution of the victim K, who is the liquidation chairman of the association, up to the end of May 2013, set up and up a banner to urge the withdrawal of the liquidation chairman, and posted it on the above apartment 204 apartment house, apartment 204 gate, apartment gate door door door door, and on the roads adjacent to the outside commercial building of apartment, and damaged the reputation of the victims by posting three banners, stating the false fact that “the liquidation chairman and the fright-distance liquidation member of the fright-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-re liquidation

2. From May 19, 2013 to the same year, Defendants who interfere with business by conspiracy.

6. From around 13.0 to around 13.0, the liquidation committee did not disclose the details of the execution of a part of the funds in the above car page, such as the annexed list of crimes, and “the chairperson left the complaint, accusation or lawsuit expected to be lost, and the expenses to be distributed to the union members have been illegally and unjustly disbursed the funds by making it available for non-qualified persons as liquidation committee members. The chairperson of the liquidation committee opened them as liquidation committee and illegally disbursed the funds. The chairperson of the liquidation committee attempted to provide external services and solve them.” The liquidation of the liquidation association interfered with the liquidation work of the liquidation committee by spreading false facts such as publishing a letter that slanders against K and liquidation members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The witness K’s legal statement 1.