logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.03 2017가합6776
전부금
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

1. On October 6, 2015, the Plaintiff and the designated parties filed a payment order seeking the return of termination of the contract with the piracy Global and the said payment order became final and conclusive (Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2015j3522, 3507 and 4875, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015j40261). On August 17, 2015, the Plaintiff and the designated parties received the Seoul Central District Court Order 2015TT18367, 18370, 18370, 2015TT2753, 22753, 2015, and 23232 of the same court on October 23, 2015, each of the instant claims against the Defendant of the Appellate Global (hereinafter referred to as “instant claims”) against the Defendant on the basis of the executory payment order, and served the entire attachment and assignment order on 15.2015.25

The fact that pursuant to the trust contract No. 29572 of the trust ledger No. 29572 of the receipt of April 10, 2015 with respect to “the total aggregate building on the ground above 3148.7 square meters in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B” concluded between the debtor and the defendant company of the third debtor company, the third debtor company has no dispute over the amount up to the claim claim of the above creditor among all the trust proceeds and the proceeds accruing from the principal and the proceeds accruing from the principal of the trust proceeds to be paid by the third debtor company of the debtor corporation, the subordinate beneficiary corporation, the debtor corporation of the third debtor company, and the third debtor company, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Ex officio determination on the requirements for litigation;

A. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the amount of the entire amount of the claim in this case has not been determined and the maturity has not yet arrived, but there is a high possibility that the piracy Global, the debtor, may file a petition for bankruptcy. If the piracy Global files a petition for bankruptcy, the validity of the seizure and assignment order of the plaintiff and the designated parties may be denied. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is required in advance.

B. The judgment of the plaintiff and the designated parties received each attachment and assignment order for the entire claim of this case, and each of the above assignment orders against the defendant company.

arrow