1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to the instant case is as follows: (a) the court shall dismiss “ August 5, 2015” of the 2nd 18th 2nd 2nd 18th 2nd 2015, “ August 5, 2015”; and (b) the following determination as to the matters asserted by the Plaintiff in this court is identical to the ground for the judgment of the first 2nd 1st 20th 2nd 2nd 15th 201

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, in the instant loans, the Plaintiff responded to the instant compulsory adjustment that Defendant C would pay the Plaintiff KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff, in think of the Defendants’ re-litigations against the remainder of the instant loans, excluding KRW 20 million, and that, in the process of conciliation in the Changwon District Court Jinju Branch 2015No558 case, the Plaintiff did not have waived the remainder of the loans.

However, regardless of whether the Plaintiff had any intention in the process of the conciliation of the instant case, and whether there was any statement to waive the remaining money, so long as compulsory conciliation of the instant case became final and conclusive because the Plaintiff did not raise any objection to the decision in lieu of the conciliation of the court, the decision shall have the same effect as a final and conclusive judgment.

The plaintiff's above assertion appears to have been derived from wrong understanding of the meaning of the decision in lieu of conciliation, and there is no reason to believe that the decision of "the plaintiff gives up the remaining claims" in the compulsory conciliation of this case is inconsistent with the decision.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.