The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact-finding, the Defendant sent 1glue tree and 1glue tree to the Defendant, and the remainder was merely the bottom of the cut tree.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts is not accepted by taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s determination of misunderstanding of facts and the evidence duly admitted by the appellate court, namely, ① the victim’s statement is consistent and photographic materials and D’s testimony are indirectly supported, ② even if some of the Defendant’s assertion was re-explodedd, it is difficult to deem that there is no property value on the bottom.

B. There is no significant change in circumstances after the judgment of the court below on the assertion of unfair sentencing.

In light of the circumstances alleged in the records and arguments of this case, such as the background of the crime, the property value of damaged objects, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, even if considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal by the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. Conclusion, pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.