logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.26 2013고단965
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 22, 2013, the Defendants’ co-offenders ordered the Defendant B to drink together in the “E” Lestop on the first floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul building D, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. However, the Defendants ordered the Defendant B to drink but the Defendant F (30 years of age) was fluored for the reasons that the Defendant F (30 years of age) was fluoring the victim, who was the auxiliary kitchen, was fluor, and was fluored for the Defendant’s face. The Defendants told G (34 years of age) who is the main kitchen, that “I will not know why he would fluort this fluor,” and the Defendant C fluord the victim’s face by combining it.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (injury by Group, Deadly Weapons, etc.) committed violence against F at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time, the Defendant was free from the victim G, and the victim’s face is humped with the floor, and the Defendant fell back with the victim’s seat, “I wish to die hump” with the bom, which is a dangerous object on the table.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim, and the victim was unable to know the number of days of treatment.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place of the performance of official duties, refused to take passengers or to take a spawn with the Defendant’s personal injury after receiving a report from the police station, and the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, while committing a spawn of the saidJ’s flab.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of public duties on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement related to J, F and G;

1. Records of seizure, photographs of seized articles and damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written agreement;

1. Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act.

arrow