1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:10 on July 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) when the victim C (here, b. 301 Dong Dong-dong B 301 501 Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter “C8 years old-do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si was considered to have an envelope in the front of the Defendant; (b) in this process,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (reports attached to telephone conversations and diagnostic certificates with victims C);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not focus on the injury inflicted by the victim for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order, and the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Summary of assault among the facts charged in the instant case

A. A. On December 30, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on December 30, 201, the Defendant was at the time of the two descendants when the victim C (the age of 38) and the head of the victim’s face and head were raised during the dispute over the problem of the cost of house relocation, which was parked in the B parking lot in Ansan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si,

B. On January 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30 on January 30, 2012, and around B 301 Dong Dong Dong-dong 301 Dong-dong 501, the Defendant: (b) had sexual intercourses with the victim, “at the time of drinking, her fluencing,” but the victim considered that she had her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

C. On July 2012, the Defendant, at the end of July 2012, in the same place as that of paragraph (2) around the end of July, 2012, was in a toilet in which the victim had a verbal dispute with the victim.