(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고단1731

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고단1731

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 19, 2015, the Defendant took a bath to a slope C belonging to the police station B in the Dong-dong Police Station B, which was called up to the Defendant's drinking value due to the Defendant's drinking value in front of the neighboring drinking house at the Jeju-si, Jeju-si., and “Is what she is inside.”

The Republic of Korea is the Republic of Korea A.

“Along with the upper part of the police officer, the police officer, who was frightened from the upper part of the police officer, was frightened by drinking, and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of public order and security of the above police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentencing guidelines under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence are as follows: The range of sentence and sentence [the group of crimes obstructing the performance of public duties, interference with the performance of public duties, the first type (the obstruction of the performance of duties and the coercion of duties), the mitigated area, one month to August], and the following circumstances, which are favorable to the determination of punishment as set forth in the order: The recognition of facts of crimes and reflects; the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment due to the obstruction of the performance of public duties; the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment due to the obstruction of the performance of duties; the fact that it is not good that the police officer called out after receiving a report is used for violence; the fact that there is a record of criminal punishment several times for violent crimes; the degree of the exercise of violence against police officers; the circumstances surrounding the crime

참조조문

-형법 제62조 제1항

-형법 제136조 제1항

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단2484

-제주지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고단1520

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.02.09 2016고단1884

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.28 2016고단150

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.04.21 2016고단290