1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 6, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the status of non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn on the ground of four arms, and was on May 29, 2015 and entered Korea again on August 10, 2015 while working at a domestic company, such as SY Industry Co., Ltd. and B Textiles factories.

B. The term of validity of the registration of job seeking was until August 28, 2015. The Plaintiff submitted a medical certificate to the Defendant due to a post-nuclear surgery and extended the said period by September 10, 2015.

C. On August 10, 2015, while the Plaintiff was on job-seeking activities after entering the Republic of Korea on his/her job-seeking activities, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant at his/her own initiative to find a world company (hereinafter “non-party company”) located in the Silsan City on September 8, 2015 (hereinafter “non-party company”).

On September 11, 2015, when the effective period of the registration of job seeking, the employee of the non-party company filed an employment application with the defendant to employ four foreign workers including the plaintiff, and the employee in charge of the defendant rejected the above application on the ground that the employee in charge of the non-party company is not a computerized input in the case of the plaintiff due to

(hereinafter referred to as “instant refusal disposition of employment permit”). D.

Then, on October 30, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for extension of the period of application for change of the workplace to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff applied for extension of the period of application for change of the workplace to the effect that the Plaintiff was unable to change the workplace within the period of validity of the job-seeking registration.

Accordingly, on November 4, 2015, the Defendant made a notification that “the extension of the period of application for change of a workplace has occurred during the period of change of the workplace, such as occupational accidents, diseases, pregnancy, childbirth, etc. (Article 25(3) of the Act), and the extension of the period of application for extension (Article 16(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act), and the Plaintiff is entitled to an extension of the period of application for change of the workplace after the expiration of the period of application for change of the workplace.” (hereinafter “instant rejection disposition”).