Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the same apartment J, K, and Defendant D as the same apartment H, I, and Defendant C, and the victim N is the head of the management office of the above apartment.

On February 15, 2017, the council of occupants' representatives determined the implementation of the project to replace the apartment water supply pipes, and subsequently promoted the replacement project, such as the residents' briefing session, design and supervision service contract.

As seen above, the Defendants: (a) started to be a special election of the president on May 22, 2017, when the project to replace the apartment water supply center was being promoted; (b) the O was selected as a candidate for the president; and (c) the Defendants were led to the position of opposing the project to replace the water supply center.

On September 19, 2017, the Defendants posted a written vindication that “(the head of the management office) caused serious impacts on the election of the current president by illegal interference and illegal intervention of the president at the time of the special election of the head of the current PP president” on the bulletin board of each Dong representative, in order to slander the victim on the grounds that the victim, who is the head of the management office, is the position of supporting the above replacement project.”

However, there was no illegal involvement of the victim in the special election for the president of the tenant representative on May 22, 2017.

Accordingly, the Defendants, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the N in the police station;

1. Each written vindication, written indictment, and written decision not to prosecute;

1. On-site photographs of bulletin boards;

1. According to the technical service contract and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is reasonable to view the part of the instant explanatory statement that “the victim, who is the chief of the management office, illegally involved in the special election of the P Chairperson, thereby adversely affecting the election,” as false, and it cannot be deemed that there is a reasonable ground for the Defendants to believe that it was true. Therefore, the Defendants’ illegality is dismissed.