beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 16,680,60, and KRW 11,120,400 to the appointed Party C, and each of the said amounts.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. Around August 4, 2003, Nonparty 1, F, etc. entered into a contract for new construction of D apartment units (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the building owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and H ground apartment units (hereinafter “D apartment units”). Around August 4, 2003, Nonparty 2, etc. entered into a contract for new construction of D apartment units (i.e., permitting owners to sell D apartment units 101, 601, and 602 to third parties after the construction of d apartment units) (hereinafter “instant contract”).
(2) On January 5, 2004, Nonparty I was subcontracted for the pelvis construction among the pelvis construction works of the pelvis construction [the construction cost of a subcontract shall be determined as KRW 556,638,00,00, which shall be assessed as KRW 451,000 (assessment as KRW 451,000) and one household in the area where the pelvis construction is in another area after the completion of construction work];
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant subcontract”) . (3) After March 30, 2004, I completed the framed construction under the instant subcontract, and around May 10, 2005, D Apartment Construction was completed, and E and F were registered to preserve ownership for each household of D Apartment under the name of the owner of each building, including E and F.
B. After I’s process of acquiring the ownership of real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “D apartment 101”), I acquired each ownership transfer on or around December 10, 2007 with respect to 8/11 shares of D apartment 602, and on February 13, 2008 with respect to 3/11 shares of D apartment 602, but the ownership was lost due to the sale by application for voluntary auction by a mortgagee.
(2) Since then, around July 23, 2009, when the lawsuit related to the payment of the aggregate construction cost of the subcontract of this case with the owner of the building was pending, I was adjusted to acquire each of the shares of E, F, D apartment 101 and 601 as part of the costs of the subcontract of this case between the owner of the building and the owner of the building, and I adjusted the above case on July 23, 2009.