logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.09.21 2018고단2178
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 4, 2018.

The Defendant, along with C and D, received a 2% check in the name of a third party in accordance with the direction of “E” in accordance with the proposal to the effect that “E would pay 2% of the withdrawal amount if money is deposited into the account designated by the C and D with the check,” and then, through a deceptive act such as “the deposit of money necessary for the loan procedure,” the Defendant sent money from the victims to the account connected with the above check, the Defendants conspired to withdraw the amount of damage and deposit the money into the account designated by “E” in order with the Defendant, to act as the so-called “E” and to act as the so-called withdrawal of the money.

On July 2017, 2017, the Happing staff is the head of a new galth G team, who is a new galth G team, and will provide a substitute loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the victim deposits money, the person without the name has no intention or ability to make a normal loan to the victim.

Around August 2, 2017, the person under whose name the victim was accused of, and caused the victim to transfer the amount of KRW 5,700,000 to the accounts of the Saemaul Treasury in the name of H (I) around August 3, 2017, KRW 5,40,000 to the accounts of the Saemaul Bank in the name of J (K) around August 3, 2017, KRW 10,000 to the national bank account in the name of L (M) on the same day, and KRW 9,60,000 to the Agricultural Bank account in the name of N around August 4, 2017. The Defendant, etc. withdrawn the said amount of damage in cash at the time, etc., and then remitted the amount of damage to the account under the direction of E (E).

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the victim F, received a total of KRW 30,70,000 from the victim F, in collusion with the victim’s employees of the Plaintiff, such as “E,” etc.

arrow