1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Fact-finding;

A. An overview of the parties: (1) The Defendant is operating from 185, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeoncheon-gun, Jeonju-gun, Ski ground (hereinafter referred to as “ski ground of this case”).

② The Plaintiff, a male in September 1968, took 19-20 years of 19 to 20 years of ski as a hobby, had the upper level of skis practical ability, most of them were on the skiing ground of this case, and used skis mainly for the upper level of skis.

B. On February 18, 2015, the process of leasing skiing equipment (i) around 10:00 on February 18, 2015, the Plaintiff visited the instant skiing ground and borrowed skiing equipment, including skiing sub-skits, skiing fkiplate, trading, and pool, from the equipment leasing shop operated by the Defendant.

② Employees in charge of the Defendant, who worked at a equipment rental shop, did not confirm the Plaintiff’s skiing experience, body weight, age, etc., and did not go through the process of checking only the Plaintiff’s key and body size from the Plaintiff, and without undergoing the process of adjusting skiing ski splates and booms (which are parts for combining skiing skki splates, and functioned to omit splates when shocked by shock).

③ In the event that the ski equipment goes beyond the ski, the ski ski ski ski ski ski ski ski skis are omitted, and the other is repeated. At around 15:00, the 15:00 notice of the ski ski ski ski ski skising over two occasions, but the ski ski skis were requested to be inspected by notifying the Defendant to the employees of the ski ski skis, but the ski s

④ Accordingly, at the equipment repair room, the Plaintiff demanded an employee in charge of the Defendant to check up trading, etc.

In spite of the plaintiff's claim that the employee is dangerous after confirming the volume of crowdfunding, the employee is not covered by crowdfunding.