Text
1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 1,050,425,410 as well as each of them, from November 30, 2007 to June 23, 2014.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant B, C’s medical institution establishment and operation 1) Defendant B, and C’s medical institution could not be established because of the lack of medical personnel. However, on November 2006, Defendant C’s husband of Defendant C, who was in charge of urology but was willing to establish a medical institution by using catology, etc., or D’s license, which was unable to operate a medical institution due to brain or any medical practice. On January 2, 2007, Defendant B and C submitted an application for permission to establish an E Hospital, a medical institution under the name of D, to the public health clinic in the Jeonsi-si of the Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi, an application for permission to establish a medical institution under the name of D on January 10, 207, and established the E Hospital, which is a medical institution under the name of the former mayor, under the name of D. 2) Defendant B and C, as the doctor in charge of urology and establishment of the E Hospital, to add Defendant D’s joint name and its change from the name “D market establishment”.
B. Defendant A’s medical treatment act, upon being employed by a medical person who is not capable of establishing a medical institution, was performed by Defendant B and C with the knowledge that the medical institution was established and operated by Defendant B and C, despite the fact that Defendant B and C was not capable of establishing a medical institution. Thus, Defendant A performed medical treatment for patients from February 1, 2007 to October 24, 2007, upon being employed by Defendant B and C.
C. Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Medical Service Act on January 15, 2008 due to criminal facts, etc. committed by the former District Court on January 15, 2008, on the grounds that Defendant C established an E Hospital, which is a medical institution, even though it was not a medical personnel, and was finally determined around that time. (2) Defendant B was not a medical personnel, and thus, Defendant B was not a medical institution.