The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) around February 16, 2012, and around February 11:30, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant not guilty on the ground that there was no proof of a crime among the facts charged in the instant case, and that there was no proof of a crime against the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) around February 16, 2012.

Examining the record, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules without exhaust all necessary deliberations.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.