logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.11.04 2015고단848
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2015, at around 09:50 on June 20, 2015, the Defendant operated a car car at around 30 km away from the rest area of the Yellow Highway, which is located in the Yellow-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, to the point where 287 km away from the rest area of the yellow Highway, which is located in the Yellow-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The register of driver's licenses, details of cancellation of driver's licenses, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on reporting without licenses;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 152 subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act for the crime of this case and Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the same Act for the selection of punishment is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and recognized his mistake in depth, and recognized that he would not drive without obtaining a license again as the last mistake, and there are circumstances to consider such as the defendant's parents and wife to support the defendant, and the fact that there are three children.

However, even though the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in this court on April 2, 2015, the crime of this case cannot be deemed to have been committed on the other hand during the two-month period from the suspension of the execution, even though he was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same crime, and even during the suspension of the execution of the sentence, it cannot be deemed that the defendant's act of violating law cannot be deemed that he had been committed on the other hand during the suspension of the execution of the crime of this case. In light of the defendant's assertion as to the background leading to the crime of this case, the defendant who is under the suspension of the execution of the execution of the crime of this case would have been able to fully consider the other way, not by allowing the defendant to drive at the same time, and there is no other inevitable circumstance that the defendant would have to drive without a license, and it is difficult to expect that the defendant has been punished by a fine so that he can maintain his work for the same kind of crime of this case.

arrow