1. The punishment of a defendant shall be determined by a credit cooperative for four months;

2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on April 10, 2010, and driven it at the speed of the speed of 6-6 degrees from the intersection of the 6-6 Yacheon Road to the intersection of the 6-6 Yacheon Road to the speed of the police station at the speed of the speed of the speed of the city, depending on three-lane.

Since there is an intersection where a signal is installed, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a way to reduce the speed and to see the side well, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while proceeding at the same speed while the front signal was changed to the stop signal, was driven by the victim D (50 years old) who driven the said intersection from the direction of the police station to the south of the tin-distance distance from the front part of the vehicle in the string line, due to the negligence of proceeding the said intersection at the same speed, and was driven by the victim D(50 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, including kneee, knee, and tensions in the part where it is necessary to provide approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment, and on the part where it is unknown, on the part of the victim FF (the age of 66) who was on board the said spagies for about 4 weeks of medical treatment; on the part of the victim G (the age of 65), the injury of the spags, which affected the victim G (the age of 65) about 5 weeks of medical treatment; on the part of the victim H (the age of 50) about 2 weeks of medical treatment, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the open spags and the part of the spags.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual survey report and photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence;