beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an armed riot of the Association of Religious Organizations C (hereinafter referred to as the “Council”) which is a branch church that belongs to the Defendant religious order, and D was appointed as the C Council on August 21, 201.
B. On July 6, 2016, the plaintiff and the C church, the E and F (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the plaintiff and the above two persons together), who are the members of the C church, committed various offenses such as embezzlement of church funds and fabrication of church documents, filed a complaint with the Defendant HH local council trial committee on July 6, 2016 on the ground that D, who is the members of the C church, had been infinite of the D church, had been infinited and operated the church at will without going through legitimate procedures in the process of constructing the church church church sex, management of the church property inappropriately, such as increasing the construction cost without going through legitimate procedures, thereby causing the failure of the church finances.
C. On September 23, 2016, the above trial committee appealed against D on September 23, 2016, and the plaintiff et al. and D appealed to the defendant general assembly trial committee (hereinafter "general assembly trial committee"). On February 17, 2017, the general assembly trial committee cannot be readily concluded that D intentionally concealed and defended G embezzlement. However, it cannot be concluded that D intentionally caused procedural problems due to improper performance of duties, and it is found that D was guilty for five months during which it was committed, while it was decided that D was exempt from some of the facts suspected of the complaint against the plaintiff et al. (hereinafter "previous new judgment"). D.
After the previous judgment on probation, on March 8, 2017, the Plaintiff et al. filed a lawsuit against Defendant H Central Local Council and D seeking the revocation of the delegation of the position of the Cridge on D.