logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.01.13 2014가합6403
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit;

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;

A. A. From April 201, the Defendant was indicted for committing a crime of deceiving 14 victims including C from April 25, 201 up to 15, 167, 73, 100 won by deceiving 14 victims including C from April 25, 201 to February 26, 201, 200, 30 Jeju District Court Decision 201Da196, 245, 201, 200Da475, 20, 205, 200, 30 Jeju District Court Decision on February 12, 2015, 205, 200Da1475, 20, 200, 30 Jeju High Court Decision on February 12, 2015, 205, 30 Jeju High Court Decision 20Da196, 2014, 204, 2014, 214, 2014 (Joint).4).

B. The Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff for a non-prosecution disposition against the Plaintiff on April 16, 2013 on the charge that the Defendant, if the Plaintiff did not repay money, provided that the Defendant would know other investors of the fact that the Defendant received the investment money by the so-called return method, and that he would be aware of the fact that the Plaintiff would not repay the money, and that he would be 230,300,000 won from April 19, 2012 to December 20, 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff for a crime of attacking the Plaintiff (No. 2014, No. 398 of the previous District Prosecutors’ Office). The prosecutor of the previous District Prosecutors’ Office against the Plaintiff on April 30, 2014, on the ground that it is difficult to view the Plaintiff’s intimidation the Defendant (Evidence pro rata of evidence).

arrow