The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won of fine, 1 year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to respect the sentencing conditions compared to the judgment of the first instance court, if there is no change in the sentencing conditions, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). The lower court sentenced the above punishment by taking account of various sentencing conditions, such as the developments leading to the instant crime and the degree of indecent act, the Defendant’s confession and reflectiveness, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim, and the primary offender. There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing newly after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, even when comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing is too excessive and does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.