logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단1674
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around February 27, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around February 27, 201, at the house of the victim D (A, B, 70-5) of C Apartment 114, 1405, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant: (b) “The monthly pension received after retirement as the principal of South and North Korea, exceeds three million won; (c) the five-story commercial buildings and two apartment bonds are owned by the Defendant. However, the nurse, who had been working in the house of a commercial building, has filed a lawsuit against the court for deposit amounting to KRW 40 million; (d) the nurse, who had been working in the house of the commercial building, was unable to display this house on the wind; and (e) the Plaintiff could not pay the interest at the rate of five percent per annum per annum for the principal of the principal until September 30, 2011.”

However, as above, although the Defendant had limited re-explosive power against the victim, the real estate owned by the Defendant had already been subject to seizure, provisional seizure, and collateral creation of creditors, which amount to a total of 1.4 billion won of the amount of the claim, and thus the compulsory decision to commence compulsory sale was imminent, the collateral value was lost. In order to purchase the above real estate, the interest rate of the debt borrowed from financial institutions, etc. reaches 300,000 won per month, and up to 200,000,000 won of the interest rate of the head of the Maspon passbook who paid every month was overdue, and it was also impossible to seek a new lessee due to excessive seizure, provisional seizure, and collateral mortgage established on the commercial building owned by the Defendant. Since it was thought that the real estate owned by the Defendant was used for the return of the deposit for deposit for lease, not for the repayment

Around February 28, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 35 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of husband, under the name of husband, from the victim.

This is the defendant.

arrow