The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the gist of the grounds for appeal, that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime since 1998, and that the defendant is at the location to support his family, the punishment of imprisonment (one hundred thousand won for imprisonment and one hundred thousand won for collection) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is deemed to have been administered once by the Defendant about 0.03g of the Mepta (one philophone) and the case is not less than that prescribed. Narcotics-related crimes are serious criminal with severe social harm and risk of recidivism, and the Defendant was sentenced 8 months to imprisonment with prison labor on September 30, 2012 for violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, etc.) at the Changwon District Court Support on May 16, 2012, and was committed again during the period of repeated offense after the execution of the sentence was completed, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime while he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on one occasion due to the same kind of crime; the Defendant’s character, character and environment; the background and result of the instant crime; the circumstances after the instant crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and pleadings after the crime cannot be deemed to be unfair. Thus, the above Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.