beta
Text
1. The Defendant stated in the Plaintiff’s Schedule column in the separate sheet to the Plaintiffs, respectively, and on March 2018, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 23, 2017, the Plaintiffs entered into an air passenger transport contract (hereinafter “instant air transport contract”) with the Defendant running air transport business under the trade name of “A” and the Defendant’s B aircraft arriving at the 14:00 Japan Bananae and the 14:00 Japan Banae (hereinafter “instant aircraft”) to use the said aircraft (hereinafter “instant aircraft”).
B. Pursuant to the instant air transport contract, the Plaintiffs arrived at the Incheon State’s supply port prior to December 11, 2017, to board the instant aircraft, and on December 23, 2017, the Incheon State provision port issued two times a corrective warning because the inside was very strong, and thereby, the aircraft belonging to the Defendant as well as other airlines were operated normally at the time.
C. Part C, which is the immediately connected part of the instant aircraft, was scheduled to arrive at the Incheon International Airport on December 23, 2017. However, at around 11:10 without landing in a pipe, the passenger was returned to the Incheon International Airport at around 13:55, and then returned to the Incheon International Airport at around 15:37, and at around 17:50, he returned to the Incheon International Airport at around 19:43, starting from the 17:50, and arrived at the Incheon International Airport at the Incheon International Airport (RAMPIN).
The connecting flight of the aircraft of this case at the Incheon State Port was changed from 11:30 to 20:20, and the scheduled departure time of the aircraft of this case was changed from 11:30 to 20:20. The hand freight of the passengers, including the plaintiffs, was loaded on the aircraft of this case, but the hand freight was rescheduled, and the defendant notified the plaintiffs of the "a partnership that does not provide alternative services" (hereinafter referred to as the "instant partnership") around 22:0 to 22:30.
E. The Defendant issued a written confirmation of a partnership stating that “10,000 won of compensation and (which is between residential place and Incheon International Airport) actual cost payment, and full refund of Part B.”
The plaintiffs are 100,000 compensation.