logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.29 2015가단106673
자동차소유권이전등록말소 등 청구의 소
Text

1. Defendant B completed on September 23, 2014, as the receipt No. 00698, regarding the Plaintiff’s motor vehicle indicated in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 20, 2014, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) on September 20, 2014, as indicated in the attached Table to F, an online high-speed trading site (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

(2) On September 22, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) received a call from a nameless winner (hereinafter referred to as “G”) indicating the name of “the person who will purchase the instant vehicle” in order to sell the purchase price at KRW 49.9 million; and (b) received a call from the Plaintiff to the effect that “the person who will purchase the instant vehicle” was “the person who will purchase the instant vehicle.” On the same day, around 14:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff was called to the effect that “the person who will display the name shall prepare and change related documents, such as a certificate of personal seal impression, etc., on which the buyer would be Defendant B.”

3) Meanwhile, on September 22, 2014, at around 10:00, the person whose name was omitted calls to the trading company E, and “ how the price has become one of the instant automobiles,” and “E, who received the calls, shall be the volume of KRW 45 million,” and “E,” notified the location of the instant automobile, and made one visit to P.M. at one time. (B) The process of concluding the sales contract for the instant automobile was called as above, and E confirmed that Defendant B intended to purchase the instant automobile.

Since then, in order to mediate a sales contract between Defendant B and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), E sought the Plaintiff at around 16:00 on the same day, and confirmed the instant motor vehicle, and then would purchase it to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff decided to sell the instant vehicle to Defendant B.

2. However, at the time, the Plaintiff and E trust only the contents of each currency with their names and did not divide any talk about the sales price of the instant automobile into one another, and did not prepare a sales contract for the instant automobile.

However, E shall pay local taxes on the instant motor vehicle.

arrow