logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.06.25 2013고단417
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 3, 2013, from around 06:00 to around 07:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s convenience store by force for about 10 minutes per hour and 10 minutes per hour on the ground that the victim did not work as a part of the victim C in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and that he did not work as a part of the victim C, within the D convenience store where he works as a part of the victim C, on the part of the victim, on the ground that he did not work as a part of the victim’s horse, and interfered with the victim’s business affairs related to the victim’s convenience store by force.

2. The Defendant of assault and damage of property requested refund of the drinking water purchased at the same time and place as above paragraph 1, and received money, and then again received the said drinking water, and subsequently the victim refused to sell the drinking water, thereby damaging the victim’s breast at one time by drinking the victim, and then b.80,000 won of the repair cost by assaulting the victim by a method of driving down the right static mouth at one time, and cutting down the street north 1, which was located on the calculation unit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence), and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow