Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. On the summary of the grounds for appeal, the court below's punishment (one year of imprisonment and 40 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs) against the defendant, the defendant asserts that it is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has the record of being sentenced to a fine for a crime favorable to the defendant and a crime that intrudes on a female toilet, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of all the crimes, the defendant seems to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of the thief committed the thief as a person with intellectual disability, the part of the thief's damage was returned to the victim, the defendant was sentenced to one and half years of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the thief) as stated in the judgment of the court below, which became final and conclusive on October 19, 2013, and the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive on October 19, 2013, which became final and conclusive, and the above crime of this case was committed in violation of the conditions favorable to the defendant, and intruded into a female toilet for the purpose of meeting the sexual desire. Furthermore, the crime of this case was committed habitually over several times during the suspended period.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.