The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant divided his mistake and agreed with the victims.

However, the crime of this case was committed against the victims who were going to the way without any particular reason, and the nature of the crime is bad, and the defendant has been punished for the same crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time during the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime as well as there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court after considering all sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.